This happened, if only because To initiate the process of exclusion for voting in the Public Chamber on the disclosure of the secrets of the investigation was in the competence of completely different bodies.
Clause 9 of part 1 of Article 14, on the basis of which the PMC appeals to the OP about the termination of powers, Litvinovich contains comprehensive grounds for such an appeal, and the reason for voting is not included in them. Those. In this case, the commission itself exceeded its own powers.
At the same time, it is clear that OP is unlikely to delve into these subtleties: she has an official appeal, as the OP apparatus recommends vote to members of the Council of the Chamber, so they will vote.
It is a pity: Marina was really included in a small number of those members of the current commission who actively work. When I stated that I would not move to the new composition of the commission, it proceeded from the fact that it was precisely such people who should take my place in it.
On the example of how Marina and Boris Klin worked in Sakharovo, when we crossed with them at the audit, I first saw a professional and indifferent approach on their parts on the issues for which the PMC is responsible by law.
In any case, I repeat: Based on the norm of the law on public supervisory commissions, it was precisely those 22 members that voted for applying for the termination of powers of Litvinovich as part of the PMC. And you need to understand first of all.
I am also sure that in this situation there is not enough assessment of the Commissioner for Human Rights in Moscow by Tatyana Protyaeva.
I express this opinion as the chairman of the previous composition of the Public Supervisory Commission of Moscow.
“ВЧК ОГПУ”
