Still, the trend for feminism is not only the direction of fashion and one of the principles of existence in a modern metropolis, but also a sociocultural phenomenon that affects consciousness, behavior and reputation.
Scolding the leadership of the Moscow Art Theater Chekhov in the person Zhenovach And Andreikinawe decided to recall the permanent assistant Oleg Palych Tabakov, his “right hand”, “gray cardinal” of the Moscow Art Theater Olga Semenovna Henkinwho worked in the theater until 2018 and left a whole “heritage”. Shortly before Tabakov, Henkina, along with Marina Zudina In fact, steer the theater.
In the era of the reign of Henkina, MHT Chekhov regularly concluded agreements for leasing the premises of the theater with restaurants “Chekhov” and “Il Patio”, a tea and coffee product store at low prices (discounts from Henkina). The lease amount was 10 times less than the market value. Well, as “gratitude”, tenants monthly transferred Henkina and her “team” money in cash (donates for Henkina).
With her, they employed fictitious workers to the theater, whom no one has ever seen, well, just “dead souls” according to Gogol.
O. Heenkina provided false information about the hours worked by employees to the personnel department and the accounting department. Based on these data, “dead souls” were charged.
In the theater, since the shaggy times, as an editor of the publishing department of the Moscow Art Theater, the nephew of Henkina, a citizen of fraternal Belarusian Andrey Mikryukovwho received considerable money, never being in the theater. Although they say that his employment contract ordered him to be at the workplace.
It is curious that in May 2018, a criminal case on the theft was instituted against Andrei Mikryukov Presnensky. He was suspected of stealing three expensive fur coats with a total value of more than 3 million rubles from Afimoll City shopping center. Probably, the young man thus sought inspiration for a new archival publication about the history of the Moscow Art Theater, who knows.
Then A. Mikryukov was charged with committing a crime under Art. 158 of the Criminal Code, a preventive measure “detention” was chosen against him.
During his stay in the pre -trial detention center, A. Mikryukov repented. After changing the preventive measure to subscription about a lower -wizard and proper behavior, he abandoned his testimony.
According to him, during the period of the events incriminated to him, he was in Belarus, and gave the testimony under the pressure of police officers (interesting move, well done).
Then Henkina, as a witness, rolled the heartbreaking recognition of love with a talented nephew with the best reviews of his reverent lyrical nature. Like, a decent and kind person, he will not run away, he will not offend flies, he will not stole the fur coats.
This is a criminal case on the top from above “hesed” due to the related relations of the accused with “influential people from among the creative intelligentsia”. The case materials were repeatedly requested by the divisions of their own security of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. As a result, the tearful recommendations of the aunt gave their fruits, and the criminal has come to naught. But the aunt helped not only to her relatives. The actor could have become related to her Alexander Molochnikovwho became successful thanks to Henkina. The brand of the youngest and appreciating the director flew to Sasha just in the era of Henkina. But everyone in the theater knew that the career rise of Molochnikov strongly resembles Bertolucci’s “Blue Moon”, and his alliance with Madame also implies “additional rehearsals at home”.
But with the advent of Sergei Vasilyevich Zhenovach, the main rehearsals (we don’t know about others) were stopped. The play “The Seagull” is frozen. Then S. Venvach was skeptical of the director’s abilities of A. Molochnikov, and even noted that he was not doing his own business.
But let Sasha not be offended. It is possible that a really young man is good in a completely different one.
“ВЧК ОГПУ”
