In his desire to keep the officers of the SD of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation in custody of the IC of the Russian Federation, even went to unprecedented violations of the law. Since you can leave in custody only 3 parts of Art. 285 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, and for this SK you need to come up with grave consequences that are not. At first, the RF IC put forward the version that the foreign company Mansfield Executive Ltd Actions of the officers caused material damage in the form of 50% of the lease right for three land plots at the address: Leningradsky Prospekt, Vl. 37 in the amount of 2.2 billion rubles. Then, realizing that the GP of the Russian Federation previously approved the indictment in the case of Khudoyan, where the same harm was caused only by the actions of Khudoyan three years earlier (in 2016), the UK began to look for other options. At first it was decided that such damage for a foreign company could be the amount of DDU prisoners for the period when the arrest from the sites was removed. Injuri, investigator Shishov even recognized the company beef a civil plaintiff in the amount of 538,432,706 rubles, but then in the UK they remembered that the lost benefit of damage in the embezzlement could not be. Since it is impossible to get officers from custody-they decided to return to the previous version, they only added 50% of the property rights located at the same address of the old airport terminal. As a result, the final prosecution appears the same amount that now in the charges of Khudoyan – 4,253,934,119 rubles.
The question remains how the GP of the Russian Federation coordinates such an accusation, because it is the causing such damage that is charged with Khudoyan in connection with the theft of these rights of a foreign company, he only abducted them in 2016, and this completely refutes the charge to investigators of the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs, that such harm could be caused by 3 years later.
“ВЧК ОГПУ”
