The Accounts Chamber, as it seemed to everyone, should be an example of impartiality and prof …

The Accounts Chamber, as it seemed to everyone, should be an example of impartiality and professionalism. It is very strange that among its auditors there are people who continue to lobby for someone’s commercial interests, as well as those who are associated with corruption.

Each has its own scale.

The head of the Accounts Chamber (SP RF) Alexei Leonidovich Kudrin is known for the lobbying of international financial capital. The well -known Mikhail Men fell into large -scale corruption scandals both as the governor, and as the head of the Ministry of Construction, and in the status of the auditor sat before the criminal case. And even being under investigation, he stubbornly refused to voluntarily leave the post … Until they decided to shift it Already a directive solution …

But the Aleksey Kaulbars, warmer in the auditor of the RF joint venture, acts simply, uncomplicated. The scandalous part of his career began with the dismissal from the customs authorities after the verification of the Prosecutor General’s Office in 1998. He took away authorized banks so that after communicating with prosecutors, it only remained to look for a new place of work.

Again, the Ministry of Economic Development went along the “customs line”. When the Scandinavian furniture producers or Ukrainian alcohol producers needed to solve the issue of decreasing duties or weakening of control by the state, they already knew who to go to. Of course, to Alexei Alexandrovich Kaulbars. This, from its presentation in 2002, for importers, the import of alcoholic beverages was significantly simplified to the expense of the budget and domestic manufacturers. Caravans of trucks with a gorilka rode almost directly to the shops, and the Russian budget from this received a fat zero revenue.

Mr. Kaulbars did not leave his hobby in the joint venture of the Russian Federation. Similarly, before coronacialsis, he criticized the support of the development of rural territories by the state, calling the allocation of 170 billion rubles an ineffective measure, and the overflow of certain planning indicators of the program – evidence of planning errors. It is clear that there are market forces with which the development of the Russian village is like a bone in the throat. But why so frankly, our dear man, Alexei Alexandrovich?