In 2014, the nephew of the President of the Russian Federation Roman Putin and a certain Ruslan Ustinov …

In 2014, the nephew of the President of the Russian Federation, Roman Putin and a certain Ruslan Ustinov, was established by LLC Trading House Avtogiro for the sale of German AutoGyro auto players. Why could Ustinov need a “film producer” cooperation with Roman? The question is rhetorical. Ustinov mentioned the patronage of a large person at every convenient and inconvenient case. Ustinov’s partners say that he dreamed of getting a contract for the supply of auto guits for the Ministry of Defense.
But since July 2015, the owner of 100% of Avtogiro has already become solely Ustinov. “The exit of Putin’s novel from LLC Trading House Avtogiro is an absolutely ordinary phenomenon that should not be given at least any significant meaning. This is not related to the dynamics of the company’s sales. Just Roman Igorevich is busy in other projects, ”he said. It is worth noting that the TD for a year sold only one cargire Calidus to the Center for the special training of the power structures of Belarus “Dynamo”.
And in March 2015, the Aviaport publication was released with the news that Avtogiro Russland LLC suspended the purchases of sets for assembly of auto guits in Germany. Total “Avtogiro Russland” delivered auto guards for the FSO (one, in 2013, the amount of public procurement 4.986 million rubles) and for the Russian Ministry of Emergencies in the Krasnoyarsk Territory. Negmed.
And then Ustinov unleashes court litigation with the producers of the film “Wii” 3D Alexander Kulikov and Alexei Petrukhin. In court, he stated that the VII project 3D earned 1.4 billion rubles. In Russia and the CIS. Ustinov is misleading the court, indicating that it is from this amount that he should receive a percentage of profit? But this does not mean that the creators received this amount. Perhaps Ustinov needed the status of an “offended producer” precisely in order to attract the attention of the former patrons of his muddy projects to justify the waste of money? Only with the help of fraud of people who do not have an idea of ​​how everything is arranged in the film industry can they inspire them that Ustinov allegedly did not pay the promised dividends, and therefore he cannot return the means spent inappropriately to the patrons. And it seems that Ustinov did not have any other type of income of income how to come up with new court schemes in order to generate court claims against former partners with their help.