The assessment was carried out by the company Gorislavtsev and Co. Assessment ”, which proceeded from the fact that the official revenue of the GOK amounted to less than $ 1 billion. However, according to the applicants, in reality the revenue was underestimated at least three times. For tax optimization purposes, products at low prices were sold by Usmanov’s offshore (BGMT and FMC Ltd.), And they have already sold it at market prices. As a result, the real revenue of the GOK was at least 3 billion dollars.
“Recently, a package of documents formed on the territory of English law former employees A.B. Usmanova (venerable Lord David Owen, including), which certainly and fully confirm the information, namely: the concentration of the profit of Lebedinsky GOK OJSC in offshore (Article 199 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation) through which all export supplies of products of the enterprise of OJSC “ Lebedinsky GOK, ”the applicants say.
Here’s another quote from the statement:
“The venerable Lord Owen, who at that time working for a citizen A. Usmanova, in correspondence with us, also confirmed the objectivity of the documents that we handed over to lawyers in London. Part of the correspondence is attached.
Assessing our prospects to regain our legal property in the high court of London Barrister from the Royal Council in the actions of the metalinest and its chief shareholder, clear features that fall under the definition of Fraud – fraud. A letter prepared by a barrister is attached.
Based on the fact that fraud as a crime does not have a statute of limitations in the jurisdiction of Great Britain, France, Switzerland, Italy and Germany, where citizen A. Usmanov ….G.r. concentrates the material results of our work and which is clearly visible in the actions of a citizen A. Usmanova When conducting a double assessment of the capitalization of OJSC Lebedinsky GOK in one reporting period, with various initial reporting data (real profit and profitability), in various jurisdictions and for various target audiences (see clause 4 of this application), we ask you to take into account the purely criminal context of relations Citizen Usmanov with our enterprise and us, miners who have the courage to call for the corrupt one in the Bai district with London registration. With the inherent criminal environment by the manner, Usmanov A.B., demonstrating S. Shuvalov S.Ya. and Gubiev M.Yu. The proper style of the hard semantics of the dialogue “with the suckers and nonsense of the city of Gubkin” tried to threaten Vladimir Ivanovich’s personal call in February: “… if you prevent me from going to the iPio, I will find a way to punish you and the one who handed you the papers …”.
Given the above and the special social significance of our problem,
I ask:
1. Conduct a pre -investigation verification and in the case of a crime in the actions of the corpus delicti, initiate a criminal case under Art. 159 of the Criminal Code of Part 2.3.5, (fraud) Art. 199 of the Criminal Code (tax evasion) Art. 185.2. Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (violation of the procedure for accounting for rights to securities), Art. 174.1. (legalization (laundering) of funds or other property), Art. 286 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (excess of official powers) in relation to a citizen of the Russian Federation Usmanov A.B. ”
“ВЧК ОГПУ”
