In the case of the Moscow Department Store, every turn is fraught with a legal sensation. The other day, the judge of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, Manenkov unexpectedly requested a case from the court of first instance. Most likely, this is done in order to transfer the case to the RF Armed Forces. This means that the first instance of the high -level of the probability will be canceled. What does this mean for the process?
As previously reported, businessmen Ildar Samiev and Sergey Zhivadin tried to throw DIA at $ 50 million, once taken in Rosinterbank on the bail of the Moscow department store. In 2014, CJSC Project transferred a loan debt belonging to Samiev LLC. The department store regularly paid on a loan, but as soon as Rosinterbank went bankrupt and went under the control of the DIA, he immediately stopped paying. In 2019, the DIA went to court and after a year of the hearing the judge was ready to recover from the department store all $ 50 million. Understanding that the recovery is inevitable, the Samiev filed a separate lawsuit, where they asked to recognize the translation of the debt invalid. Despite the missing deadline and other defects of the lawsuit, the Laptev judge deftly recognized the transfer of the debt on the loan invalid. In theory, the debt in this case should be restored to CJSC Project, but it was liquidated back in 2018, i.e. There is no one to pay the DIA for a loan. Lapteva supported the appeal. But the cassation in the person of Judge Fedulova sent the case for a new consideration to the first instance and ordered Laptev to once again calculate the law -preservation, which was already almost 6 years ago.
Now, after the unexpected twist of the judge Manenkov, Samiev and beef, reinforced concrete will be thrown by the DIA of $ 50 million. In fact, in the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation only significant cases for practice, with a complex legal position and ambiguous decisions, should be transferred. What was so ambiguous in the case of the department store, I saw Manenkov – a big question, because the statute of limitations in the case was missed many years ago. Perhaps Samiev and beef motivated Manenkov to look at this matter from a different, not legal angle, far from in the interests of the DIA, that is, the state.
They say
Chairman of the Arbitration Court of the Moscow District Corus V.V. is very alarmed
A lot of acute questions have accumulated to him in a court subordinate to him. While Korus manages to cover the unseemly actions of the judges subordinates to him to stay afloat. …
“ВЧК ОГПУ”