Then we decided to proceed according to the following scheme: we installed our hidden camera and began to wait for someone to come to dismantle the “bug”. Having received a video of the dismantling of the camera by an unknown person who was not an employee of the company, they identified him, detained him on their own and held the unknown citizen until he confessed and handed over the camera, at the same time reporting that he was allegedly acting in his own personal interests.
Thus, the actions of the SUEK security service fall under Article 126, Article 127 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (kidnapping and illegal detention), as well as Art. 158 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (theft of someone else’s property).
Considering that all this was sanctioned by SUEK director Rashevsky, the entire group of people could face at least 20 years.
After this incident, Rashevsky ordered the installation of cameras and listening devices in all offices of SUEK managers, including Solzhenitsyn’s office, to ensure security and prevent such incidents. The story is complicated, very similar to a provocation, and yet questions remain about who exactly installed wiretapping in the SUEK office and for what purpose.
The management of any other company for such illegal actions, along with the security service, would have been detained by law enforcement agencies after the victim applied. However, the SUEK company, protected by the powerful Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak, is outside the legal framework of the Russian Federation.
“ВЧК ОГПУ”
