Hungry Petersburg? Internecine wars of entrepreneurs for profitable contracts in …

Hungry Petersburg? The internecine wars of entrepreneurs for favorable contracts in the field of food can deprive children of hot food in schools for some time. Unfortunately, neither law enforcement agencies, nor legislators, nor officials can stop the traditional scheme of raider seizure. Well, or they can, but they don’t want to. The schemes are banal, it is necessary to deprive the company of assets: if the company lives by state contracts, it is necessary to provide circumstances when their current orders are terminated, while others will no longer be able to take. Moreover, it is desirable to do this so that in the process of struggle, the enterprise spent as much resources as possible to “beat”. There is the only circumstance in which state contracts are terminated “a significant violation of the terms of the contract”, i.e. Failure to fulfill the contract of one of the parties. Two winnings criterion – price criterion and non -price. Since the first is directly related to profit and is achieved by dumping, they usually work with the second. Reputation, violations, gratitude, reviews, experience, qualifications, etc. Everything can be attributed to the customer to a non -price criterion. Dozens of companies “squeeze” according to this scheme “quietly”, the owners are very lucky if the story with an attempt to capture pops up in the media. The case of the capture of St. Petersburg plants – got into the media. What happens: circumstances are ensured when contracts are on the verge of failure and a reputation is destroyed.

What was spent in two days:

• custom material in the media on behalf of an employee, about the “everyday life” of the company’s work

• Departure of law enforcement officials for economic crimes (media lighting)

• Order material in the media

• Departure of employees of Rospotrebnadzor for violations of SanPiN at the enterprise

• Departure of employees of Rospotrebnadzor to separate units of enterprises.

• Order material in the media

What is achieved:

• In the media, negative materials about the enterprise (reputation)

• The daily schedule of employees who fulfill the state order (Fin. Costs) is violated

• Logistics, schedule of orders, violation of the regulations of production (potential threat violation of the contract)

• prohibition on the activities of a separate unit. RPN

It is curious that the main “pressure tool” is the same organ and the same publication. RPN – headed by Natalia Bashkova and the media “Fontanka”, headed by Alexander Gorshvov.

Moreover, and one and the second have been caught more than once at the “custom” work. On those pages of the media, you can find information as St. Petersburg RPN for a long time strictly on “interest” on any issue, and the price tag of Fontanka for “struggle” with injustice and lawlessness.