The prosecution read out the testimony of Canadian citizen Larisa Zori. Her testimony contradicted the testimony of previous prosecution witnesses, Mr. Egorov and Ms. Klepikova.
Reading out the testimony of Larisa Zori from 2019, the prosecutor refused to read out the last paragraph of the testimony, which said: “After the murder of my husband due to the lack of a will, six months after the murder of my husband Zorya E. And I, together with my two daughters, inherited all the property belonging to spouse. I also inherited debts from credit institutions in the amount of no more than $3 million.”
It is clear why the prosecutor did not read this paragraph. This testimony is unfavorable for the prosecution, because the investigation puts forward the version that the murder occurred over a hangar worth 240 thousand rubles, and that the legal dispute over the hangar was the only concern for Zorya, while it turns out that he had turnovers and debts in the amount of 3 million dollars.
In 2004, after Zori’s death, the entire Khabarovsk press wrote that the murder took place because of the money of the Obshchak.
The investigation considered 8 versions of the murder, and one of them was an order from the wife.
“ВЧК ОГПУ”
